[Distutils] Backwards compatability: opinions?
Fred L. Drake
Fred L. Drake, Jr." <firstname.lastname@example.org
Wed, 10 Mar 1999 17:06:44 -0500 (EST)
Greg Ward writes:
> Seems to me that the three most important language/library features in
> 1.5 were:
> * packages
Try "import ni" in the script for older Pythons. This worked fine
for Grail until other aspects of the code required 1.5. Make sure the
__init__.py files contain nothing by comments and docstrings.
> * re and r''
Use regex and more backslashes. These are convenient, but not
required for functionality.
> * class-based exceptions
Not required for functionality.
> re and class-based exceptions are only used under 1.5, but I'm not sure
> if I could sweep the heavily "packagized" nature of the Distutils under
> the rug. Would we have to resurrect use of the 'ni' module in the 1.4
> case? Would that be painful?
if sys.version[:3] < "1.5":
> Any other language features I should be wary of avoiding? I am willing
> to consider supporting 1.4 if it won't be too much trouble, but not in
> the initial phases -- we should probably worry about that when it comes
> time to make a public release in a few months.
Don't use assert; write a function that does the same thing. This
is trivial, but you're welcome to steal the Assert module from Grail
if it's too much typing. ;-)
Fred L. Drake, Jr. <email@example.com>
Corporation for National Research Initiatives