[Distutils] extensions in packages
Just van Rossum
just@letterror.com
Fri, 21 May 1999 12:20:47 +0200
At 11:22 AM +0200 5/21/99, hinsen@dirac.cnrs-orleans.fr wrote:
>> find_module() should then first check sys.builtin_module_names with the
>> full name before doing anything else. (probably only when it is confirmed
>> that "foo" is a package.)
>
>All that would be doable, but the real problem is the name of the init
>function!
Right, I was being naive: I thought that was just "a" problem...
>Only one module can define a global symbol "initbar". So the
>one for foo.bar would have to be called "initfoo.bar" (or something
>similar). On the other hand, when the same module is used dynamically,
>the init function must be called "initbar" again (unless the current
>import mechanism is changed).
So there are really two options:
1) Define a switch that C extensions can check to determine whether the
init func should be called initbar or initfoo_bar (or something).
This means it's up to the extension developer to cater for statically
linked builtin submodules by doing something like this in the extension
source:
#ifdef PY_STATIC_SUBMODULES
#define initbar initfoo_bar
#endif
2) change the DL import mechanism so the init function *has* to be called
initfoo_bar. But then, to remain backwards compatible you'd still have use
a switch, so it doesn't help much now.
Just