[Distutils] copy_file semantics changed?
Thu, 22 Jun 2000 21:43:41 -0400
On 22 June 2000, I spoke too soon:
> That assumes that I changed the interface to return boolean arbitrarily.
> I did not: I believe there is code that depends on it returning
> boolean. And now there is also code that depends on it returning the
> output filename. Damn! Time to grep the source for copy_file and see
> how it's *really* used...
Well, from poking through the CVS logs, it appears that 'copy_file()'
has *always* returned boolean. And from scanning the source, it appears
that no code actually expects it to return boolean -- the only bits that
pays attention to the return value are my recent additions that use
'copy_file()'s supposed string return value to build list of files
So, Bastian's patch is exactly the right thing. (Except you forgot to
fix the docstring! Don't worry, I did it.) Applied, checked in, and
now maybe things will work again.
Greg Ward - geek-at-large email@example.com
The NSA. We care: we listen to our customers.