[Distutils] Suggested additions to function argument list
Thomas Heller
thomas.heller@ion-tof.com
Fri, 12 May 2000 19:23:34 +0200
> The command-line syntax for Borland's linker (called ILINK32) is:
>
> ILINK32 [options] objects, [exe], [mapfile], [libs], [deffile]
>
> The name of the module definition file, if specified, must appear in
exactly
> the position shown. It's not considered one of the "options" which can
> appear in any order at the beginning of the command line. And after a
second
> look at the documentation for ILINK32 it doesn't appear that they have
> anything analogous to the /EXPORTS switch for naming the exported
symbol(s)
> directly on the command line.
Looks much like the MSVC 1.5 (the 16-bit compiler) linker command line.
[Just curious (and unrelated to python extensions): What about resources?
How are they built into the executable?]
So what to do?
- REQUIRE a def file? (Extension writers on unix would like not to have to
care
about this)
- Trust the extension writer to use the (compiler specific?) pragmas?
(Same as above)
- Dynamically build a def-file and delete it after the build?
Maybe the (distutils-generated) temporary def-file would be the best.(?)
Greg?
Thomas