[Distutils] Tasks arising from IPC9
Sean Reifschneider
jafo@tummy.com
Sat Mar 24 03:15:01 2001
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 12:31:41PM -0500, Andrew Kuchling wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 12:19:04PM +0100, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>>Could we make a similar decision on the name of the command (before
>>actually adding support for it to distutils), so that package
>>authors can start coding their own implementation now ?!
>
>"test" seems the most obvious command name, so let's choose that.
>(Which reminds me... they don't seem to have added PyUnit to the core yet...)
Along with the name, I think that it'll have to have a default stub which
does an "exit(0)" (the default test succeeds) so that the lack of a test
doesn't show up the same as a test failure.
Sean
--
"Having computers is a lot like having kids, except it's not as much of a
problem if they die while you're away." -- Sean Reifschneider, 1997
Sean Reifschneider, Inimitably Superfluous <jafo@tummy.com>
tummy.com - Linux Consulting since 1995. Qmail, KRUD, Firewalls, Python