[Distutils] should setuptools be an implicit dependency of every egg?
faassen at infrae.com
Wed Sep 20 11:36:32 CEST 2006
Tres Seaver wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> Jim Fulton wrote:
>> These downsides are, in practice, pretty minor. My main objection is
>> that I don't like encouraging people to be sloppy about
>> dependencies. The counter argument, of course, is that the standard
>> library is an implicit dependency and we are behaving as if
>> setuptools is part of the standard library.
> Perhaps we need a lint-like utility ('candle.py', perhaps :) which
> examines a given egg, looking for issues such as imports from packages
> which are not in a path synthesized from the egg's dependencies?
That'd be useful. It'd be especially useful if it were integrated into
setuptools, as that way it's a bit more likely people will actually use it.
More information about the Distutils-SIG