[Distutils] tests_require and test_suite in egg-info
jim at zope.com
Fri Jan 5 14:27:54 CET 2007
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> At 05:10 PM 1/4/2007 -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
>> I can't do any of this if all I have is an egg. I want to be able to
>> be able to run the
>> tests that come with eggs.
>> I suggest that it would be better for setuptools to record this
>> information by default.
>> Then again, I think that these are duplicative of other features.
>> For example,
>> tests_require could just be handled by an entry in extras_require for
>> a "tests"
>> extra and test suites could be handled as entry points.
> The setuptools test command has a broader mission than just that,
Can you summarize the mission of the test command?
AFAICT, it boils down to running tests.
> having entry points for tests to be run by tools like zc.buildout is
> certainly a good idea;
Note that zc.buildout wouldn't run the test. A buildout recipe
would create a test runner script that can run the tests.
> I suggest you create and publicize a de facto
> standard for them.
OK. I'll propose something in a separate note.
> The tricky part is that unless there is some way for setuptools to tell
> 1. the test suite is included, and
> 2. it can be adequately described as an entry point or collection thereof
> then I don't see a way to automatically map from existing test
> information to entry points.
> In particular, note that setuptools allows custom loaders to essentially
> usurp the entire standard testing process. Although testing is intended
> to be automatable, and have a common access point ("setup.py test"), the
> output of such test and the required environment (GUI, CLI,
> interactivity?) for them is not defined. So, trying to build a
> higher-level harness on the basis of what setuptools allows for is
> probably not a good idea here.
OK. I'm convinced.
> However, the reverse is possible: if you define a standard for these
> things that the entry points must conform to, then I can make setuptools
> support *that* standard, and even recommend it in the documentation as
> the preferred way to specify a test target.
> Does that make sense?
Yup. Very much.
Jim Fulton mailto:jim at zope.com Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
More information about the Distutils-SIG