[Distutils] Bazaar support for setuptools

Barry Warsaw barry at python.org
Sat Jul 21 16:43:54 CEST 2007

Hash: SHA1

[removed the bazaar list from the recipients]

On Jul 21, 2007, at 1:02 AM, Phillip J. Eby wrote:

> At 11:24 PM 7/20/2007 -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> Great for testing, thanks.  But um, how /do/ normal users tell
>> setup.py to install those extra packages?
> Normally, people use install_requires, and the packages get  
> installed automatically if you're using setuptools or easy_install.
> Meanwhile, if you want to install a package's extras, you just use  
> "easy_install foo[bar,baz]" to install package foo with extras bar  
> and baz.  "setup.py install" can't and won't ever handle extras.
> Please keep in mind, though, that extras are for *optional*  
> features.  Your package won't work without bzrlib, so that's not  
> really an "extra" and probably shouldn't be defined as such.

Agreed that in this particular example, extras aren't appropriate.   
But I have another use case where I definitely want to declare an  
optional dependency (e.g. munepy's optional dependence on the nose  
package for tests).

So I'm wondering, why do you say setup.py can't and won't every  
support this?  Is there a technical or philosophical limitation?  I  
would think there should be a user friendlier way for a developer  
sitting there at the setup.py file to request that the optional  
packages get installed.  I don't count using a different command as  
"user friendlier".

- -Barry

Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)


More information about the Distutils-SIG mailing list