[Distutils] [ANN] EggFreezer

[Christopher Arndt]

zooko schrieb:
> On Aug 5, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Ian Bicking wrote:
> 
>> No... which makes binary eggs unusable on Linux.  I feel like there 
>> was something else that made binary packages on a Mac unreliable, but 
>> I can't remember.
> 
> Perhaps it was http://bugs.python.org/setuptools/issue19 (Will 
> setuptools on Mac Python accept fat eggs?).

Yes, that's what I meant. setuptools on Mac OS X 10.5 does not accept 
'fat' binary eggs build on 10.4.

Diez. R. Roggisch schrieb:
 > Why shouldn't they?

Or can you install all of the following on Leopard?

http://files.turbogears.org/eggs/simplejson-1.9.1-py2.5-macosx-10.3-fat.egg
http://files.turbogears.org/eggs/RuleDispatch-0.5a0.dev_r2306-py2.5-macosx-10.3-fat.egg
http://files.turbogears.org/eggs/PyProtocols-1.0a0dev_r2302-py2.5-macosx-10.3-fat.egg
http://files.turbogears.org/eggs/Cheetah-2.0rc8-py2.5-macosx-10.3-fat.egg

Chris