[Distutils] [Fwd: Re: Annoucing distribute project]
tseaver at palladion.com
Sat Sep 27 13:48:53 CEST 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Greg Ewing wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> Yeah, but *is* dropping backward compatibility an option here?
> I'm not sure the concept of backward compatibility
> makes sense here. The only kind of distutils replacement
> I would be interested in would have a completely different
> API, completely different structure and completely
> different implementation. Anything less would fail to
> fix the problems we want to fix.
> Given that, what would it even *mean* for the new tool
> to be backward compatible with distutils?
I think a tool which was willing to fake being distutils enough to
extract information from existing 'setup()' calls would probably be
enough, myself, so that:
$ python <bbb_extractor_script>.py setup.py
would create the equivalent of PKG_INFO / EGG_INFO on disk, where it
could then be used to drive the new installer.
>> The same might be happen to distutils 2 in a few years. You are going
>> to have to plan making it more maintainable.
> A modular structure with an easy-to-follow implementation
> would certainly be part of the plan, I hope.
And good tests and even better docs.
Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver at palladion.com
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Distutils-SIG