[Distutils] Proposing PEP 386 - a standard version scheme

Darren Dale dsdale24 at gmail.com
Tue Dec 8 14:09:04 CET 2009

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/12/7 Tarek Ziadé <ziade.tarek at gmail.com>:
>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Floris Bruynooghe
>> <floris.bruynooghe at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 10:53:11PM +0100, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>>>> As I expected, we didn't find a full consensus on the final PEP 386
>>>> schema on Distutils-SIG. But the one presented is
>>>> good enough for what we need to express, as far as I am concerned (and
>>>> some other people).
>>>> This status understandable, and can go on for months in distutils-SIG.
>>> Your brain might have thought of more then your fingers wrote
>>> here... Not sure what that's supposed to mean but the last sentence
>>> doesn't look complete to me.
>> I'll need some help then on this one, must be my frenglish at work.
> "I believe that the current situation is as close to consensus as we
> will get on distutils-sig, and in the interests of avoiding months of
> further discussion which won't take things any further, I propose to
> allow final comments from python-dev and then look for a final
> decision".
> How does that sound?

Much better, in my opinion.


More information about the Distutils-SIG mailing list