[Distutils] Proposing PEP 386 - a standard version scheme

Tarek Ziadé ziade.tarek at gmail.com
Tue Dec 8 14:41:07 CET 2009

2009/12/8 Darren Dale <dsdale24 at gmail.com>:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2009/12/7 Tarek Ziadé <ziade.tarek at gmail.com>:
>>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Floris Bruynooghe
>>> <floris.bruynooghe at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 10:53:11PM +0100, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>>>>> As I expected, we didn't find a full consensus on the final PEP 386
>>>>> schema on Distutils-SIG. But the one presented is
>>>>> good enough for what we need to express, as far as I am concerned (and
>>>>> some other people).
>>>>> This status understandable, and can go on for months in distutils-SIG.
>>>> Your brain might have thought of more then your fingers wrote
>>>> here... Not sure what that's supposed to mean but the last sentence
>>>> doesn't look complete to me.
>>> I'll need some help then on this one, must be my frenglish at work.
>> "I believe that the current situation is as close to consensus as we
>> will get on distutils-sig, and in the interests of avoiding months of
>> further discussion which won't take things any further, I propose to
>> allow final comments from python-dev and then look for a final
>> decision".
>> How does that sound?
> Much better, in my opinion.

Thanks Paul !

I'll send it sometimes today


More information about the Distutils-SIG mailing list