[Distutils] Colour this bikeshed: Name for setuptools fork

[Chris Withers]

P.J. Eby wrote:
> At 07:38 PM 7/17/2009 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
>> Whether or not the fork is friendly, it is a fork, not a continuation. 
>> Also, there never really was a “setuptools 1”. I think it's only 
>> going to be confusing to call this “setuptools 2”.
> 
> Definitely.  I'd really rather it not be called that, and would prefer 
> that your versioning scheme not imply a continuation either...  
> *especially* if it's based on the 0.6x branch, which is just about a 
> dead parrot at this point.

Phil,

How come you couldn't reply to anything other than this?

I really don't understand your attitude and lack on communication on 
what has become so important a package...

Chris

-- 
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting
            - http://www.simplistix.co.uk