[Distutils] RFC : Version comparison

[Tarek Ziadé]

On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 9:20 PM, P.J. Eby <pje at telecommunity.com> wrote:
> At 08:58 PM 5/6/2009 +0200, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>>
>> Sorry to post again that mail, but it seems that this is the last
>> remaining
>> issue for the versionning proposal.
>>
>> Phillip, could you check my proposal for your development versions of
>> postreleases
>> use case ?
>
> Is the code up-to-date with the below?

No, I'll do a branch then with that version
>
>
>> thx
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Tarek Ziadé <ziade.tarek at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > 2009/4/22 P.J. Eby <pje at telecommunity.com>:
>> >> I don't see how it can manage, e.g. a development version of a
>> >> postrelease,
>> >> with an SVN rev or date stamp on it.  Such versions might not be found
>> >> on
>> >> PyPI or on RPMs, but would be needed in development.
>> >
>> > So, instead of having 'dev' and 'post', we would require a third case
>> > for "pos+dev" version
>> >
>> > so  (dev|post)N+ could become, ((dev|post)N+)|(postN+devN+)
>> >
>> > example:
>> >
>> > 1.0.dev459 < 1.0 < 1.0.post456dev463 < 1.0.post456 < 1.0.post489
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> (Btw, the wiki page pseudo-regex doesn't match what the code actually
>> >> parses, either.)
>> >>
>> >
>> > i'll check it thx
>> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org
>
>



-- 
Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org