[Distutils] Adding entry points into Distutils ?
tseaver at palladion.com
Thu May 7 16:20:46 CEST 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Eric Smith wrote:
> Doug Hellmann wrote:
>> On May 7, 2009, at 8:54 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
>>> 2009/5/7 Doug Hellmann <doug.hellmann at gmail.com>:
>>>> I would argue the other way. Why force authors of console scripts to
>>>> with entry points instead of just installing the script as-is?
>>> Please explain "as-is" with reference to ensuring that the script
>>> works cross-platform. I think the benefit of entry points for scripts
>>> is that it generates appropriate wrappers to allow use on all
>> I write a python script call hello.py like this:
>> #!/usr/bin/env python
>> def main():
>> print 'hello!'
>> if __name__ == '__main__':
>> Why make me define an entry point for that? I can just put it in
>> /usr/bin or somewhere in the path on Windows and call it as "hello.py".
>> Does setuptools give me something extra for Windows? I'm not a regular
>> Windows user, so it's likely that there are features I don't know about.
> Yes. It creates a .exe wrapper . By using entry points, I don't need
> to care what the target system is. Also, /usr/bin/env might invoke the
> wrong python.
Exactly: using entry points for console scripts guarantees that the
python into which the corresponding distribution is installed is the one
used to run the script, which is *highly* desirable. Otherwise, you end
up with the "just install everything in the system Python's
Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver at palladion.com
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Distutils-SIG