[Distutils] setup.cfg new format proposal
Tarek Ziadé
ziade.tarek at gmail.com
Tue Sep 15 18:29:01 CEST 2009
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Floris Bruynooghe
<floris.bruynooghe at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 05:14:58PM +0200, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>> Also, I've just realized that uname() is a tuple, so I need to flatten
>> it in strings to restrict the grammar:
>>
>> - os_sysname
>> - os_nodename
>> - os_release
>> - os_version
>> - os_machine
>
> When I asked for this I was imagening (wrongly) way more to go in
> setup.cfg then just the meta-data. To be honest in that case I don't
> think I've got a use for os.uname() to be available. While nothing is
> wrong with having it, if no one else thinks they need it maybe it's
> unnecessary complication?
I guess we could leave them since they don't hurt, and see after a version
if they are not used by people.
os_machine help though, knowing if it's a 32 or 64 bits machine
>
> Regards
> Floris
>
> --
> Debian GNU/Linux -- The Power of Freedom
> www.debian.org | www.gnu.org | www.kernel.org
> _______________________________________________
> Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
>
--
Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org | オープンソースはすごい!
More information about the Distutils-SIG
mailing list