[Distutils] Fwd: [Catalog-sig] Trove categories for Buildout recipes and extensions

["Martin v. Löwis"]

>>> Doesn't "Framework :: Buildout :: Recipe" already imply "Framework ::
>>> Buildout" ?
>>
>> If it indeed could have meant "Framework :: Buildout :: Extension"
>> instead, and if "Framework :: Buildout :: Extension" and
>> "Framework :: Buildout :: Recipe" are indeed different things, then:
>> no.
> 
> That's not what I meant exactly. What I meant that is you declare a
> Trove classifier "A :: B :: C" aren't you implicitly declaring "A :: B"
> and "A" as well, so you don't need to specify them separately?

Oops, I read it reverse, sorry.

It unfortunately depends on who is interpreting the data. For
compatibility, I would err on the safe side and just include the
old classifier as well. But you are right; it would be redundant.

Regards,
Martin