[Distutils] Additional trove classifiers for Plone

[Alex Clark]

Hi,

On 10/17/11 9:00 AM, Alex Clark wrote:
> On 10/16/11 1:19 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>>> But let me run this by plone-dev, to get some more
>>> feedback/confirmation; I'll get back to you with the exact/complete
>>> list.
>>
>> Please also verify that they are all needed. Minimality is an objective,
>> so if some plone versions are out-of-date, there is no point in adding a
>> classifier.
>
>
> OK Here is the list:
>
>
> Framework :: Plone :: 3.3
> Framework :: Plone :: 4.0
> Framework :: Plone :: 4.1
> Framework :: Plone :: 4.2
> Framework :: Plone :: 4.3
>
>
> (3.3 was the first Plone version to be distributed as an egg. And 4.3 is
> as far in the future as we know about right now.)
>
> To answer the other two questions (I found on the catalog list, sorry, I
> guess I should have asked there.)
>
> * what specific semantics would you imply for packages tagged with these
> classifiers?
>
> These classifiers imply compatibility with a particular Plone release.
> For example, we have add-ons that only work with 4.0 (and not 4.1, etc).
>
> * what specific packages that are already on PyPI would be tagged with
> these specific classifiers?
>
> Anyone releasing Plone add-ons to PyPI will now be able to specify Plone
> version compatibility in setup.py. I suspect that most, if not all,
> actively maintained add-ons will make use of this classifier e.g.
> http://pypi.python.org/pypi/Products.PloneFormGen. But there are too
> many to list. Note Plone core packages may or may not make use of these
> classifiers. They could, but the request is made explicitly on behalf of
> add-on developers.
>
>
> Thank you for considering,
>

Any word on this?


Thanks,


Alex



>
>
> Alex
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Martin
>> _______________________________________________
>> Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG at python.org
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
>>
>
>