[Distutils] [Catalog-sig] Fwd: The state of PyPI

Noah Kantrowitz noah at coderanger.net
Tue Sep 27 19:24:02 CEST 2011

I've copied our current draft plan for the structure of the PyPI infra. I stress this is just a draft as it stands today and is not final.

On Sep 27, 2011, at 2:40 AM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
> == better infra ==

The current plan is to have two primary load balancer VMs running Nginx acting as both balancer and SSL termination points. These will share a set of floating IPs using Heartbeat. Behind this will be the same Apache configuration currently in use (Apache serving static files and PyPI running as an FCGI script controlled by Apache) running on two VMs, both talking to the same master-slave Postgres 9 replication setup. Package files will initially be handled by a shared DRBD drive, however this may be obsoleted by the project to move file hosting to Cloudfront or another CDN.

A currently open question is how best to provide reliability and security for the SSH-based file upload system currently deployed on ximenez. Most likely we can setup the initial SSH endpoint on the load balancers to run a proxy to one of the main PyPI application servers, however failover would have to be semi-manual (possibly driven by Chef, meaning a chef-client run would have to happen before the tunnel would be updated, or anywhere up to 30 minutes). Given the relatively minimal public knowledge of this service, I think this is acceptable as a first-pass but a future solution involving HAProxy or another TCP load balancer to handle the SSH traffic might be appropriate. Similarly, automated database failover is not planned at this time due to the extra application-side complexity however the process will be well documented and able to be executed by all tier one on-call operations staff if the Postgres master goes offline for some reason.

This will only partially address the current reliability issues as many of the current problems are linked to Apache or mod_fcgid needing to be restarted. In that light I would like to see PyPI and the catalog-sig group investigate moving the codebase to work against mod_wsgi or gunicorn (no real preference between the two) to create a more reliable runtime environment.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 163 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/attachments/20110927/f03dcb94/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Distutils-SIG mailing list