[Distutils] conventions or best practice to choose package names?

[Benoît Bryon]

Hello,

The proposal has been posted to peps at python.org : 
http://hg.python.org/peps/file/52767ab7e140/pep-0423.txt

I am about to post it to python-dev at python.org for discussion and review.

In order to complete the move, I plan to replace the document by 
references to PEP 423 in packaging section of cpython documentation. See 
also http://bugs.python.org/issue14899


Benoit


Le 19/06/2012 23:49, Benoît Bryon a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Le 06/06/2012 10:52, Benoît Bryon a écrit :
>> Le 31/05/2012 18:00, PJ Eby a écrit :
>>> You've definitely put in a lot of work on this, and most of the 
>>> actual guidelines in your PEP are quite good.  I think there's a 
>>> core part of this that can and should be a good Informational-track 
>>> PEP.
>>
>> If it actually becomes a draft PEP, I guess we should:
>>
>> * move the document in PEPs' repository
>> * add notes in Python packaging documentation to reference the PEP.
>
> Updated 
> https://bitbucket.org/benoitbryon/cpython/src/doc-package-names/Doc/packaging/packagenames.rst
> Prepared migration to a PEP.
> I am to submit the document for review at peps at python.org. Feedback is 
> welcome!
>
>
> Le 06/06/2012 10:52, Benoît Bryon a écrit :
>> Also, I propose to shorten or move the "terminology" section in 
>> another document (another pep or in packaging documentation):
>>
>> * it would simplify the document
>> * we'd better share the terminology between several documents.
>
> Moved terminology section to packaging/introduction.rst.
> See 
> https://bitbucket.org/benoitbryon/cpython/changeset/5eca478e6804#chg-Doc/packaging/introduction.rst
>
> Benoit
> _______________________________________________
> Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig