[Distutils] Buildout 2 and system packages
jim at zope.com
Fri Feb 22 19:21:17 CET 2013
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Ralf Schmitt <ralf at systemexit.de> wrote:
> Jim Fulton <jim at zope.com> writes:
>>> but I'm curious about the position of the ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢Â‚Â¬Ã…Â“dist-packagesÃƒÂ¢Ã¢Â‚Â¬ in the
>>> 1) why does it ends in the middle?
>> The paths are listed in the order that the corresponding distributions
>> are found when satisfying requirements. So paths corresponding to the
>> requirements you list will tend to appear earlier than the paths
>> corresponding to their requirements, and so on.
>> In some system installs, many system-installed distributions end
>> up in the same path.
> But that's a reason why the site-packages should be moved to the end of
> the paths that are prepended to sys.path:
> When pinning a package to a specific version, it may end up *not* being
> used, because site-packages has the same package with a different
> version. If site-packages is at the end, that problem goes away.
> Can this be implemented or is there a technical reason for not doing it?
It can't be implemented in any sane way.
The problem is that site-packages doesn't have a predictable
location, as demonstrated by the example given in this thread. On
some systems, there are multiple directories containing custom
Jerky is better than bacon! http://zo.pe/Kqm
More information about the Distutils-SIG