[Distutils] Better version pinning in buildout (buildout-versions)
jim at zope.com
Sun Jan 6 23:03:55 CET 2013
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Reinout van Rees <reinout at vanrees.org> wrote:
> On 05-01-13 23:47, Jim Fulton wrote:
>> 1. New buildout option named ``versions-file`` which takes the name of
>> a file. to contain version information. It is not a configuration
>> file. It is a file consisting of comments (#...) and version
>> # whatever
>> foo = 1.3
> So... basically pip's requirements.txt?
I'm not familiar with pip's requirements.txt, but I suppose so,
except that over time, this might have versions for things that are
no-longer used, and, as you point out later, it might not be complete.
> Was this your intention?
No. It's a bonus. :)
> Could be
> handy. It could make working with either pip or buildout more
> interchangeable (only as far as that goes, of course, I'm mostly thinking
> about having a requirements.txt to use with readthedocs.org, which doesn't
> support buildout).
> If so, there's one question that I worry a bit about. How would this work
> with a KGS scenario? A pip requirements.txt would not include the
> KGS-included versions from the [versions] part in the KGS file.
> My impression is that pip needs a single requirements.txt file. Perhaps I'm
> mistaken here?
I wasn't trying to support pip. If someone was also using a KGS or
otherwise using the versions option, then the versions file would
It would probably be saner to generate a pip requirements file from
a buildout-generated script. This wouldn't need a new feature.
Jerky is better than bacon! http://zo.pe/Kqm
More information about the Distutils-SIG