[Distutils] Expectations on how pip needs to change for Python 3.4

Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Sun Jul 14 10:12:22 CEST 2013

On 14 July 2013 17:50, Donald Stufft <donald at stufft.io> wrote:

> I do think pip is pretty conservative about backwards compat other than
> the security related changes I've been doing.
> I think we can find the middle ground that lets things work smoothly here
> :). I was just making sure that we wernt going to have to keep things
> around for really long times like python 4 ;)

Even most of the standard library isn't that conservative - it usually only
happens when we can't find a sensible place to hook up DeprecationWarning.


Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/attachments/20130714/88df17b5/attachment.html>

More information about the Distutils-SIG mailing list