[Distutils] Q about best practices now (or near future)

Paul Moore p.f.moore at gmail.com
Thu Jul 18 23:56:08 CEST 2013


On 18 July 2013 22:08, Marcus Smith <qwcode at gmail.com> wrote:

> it's a practical problem for users, due to being currently responsible for
> fulfilling the setuptools dependency themselves in non-virtualenv
> environments
> IMO, we need to bundle or install it for them (through dynamic installs,
> or add the logic to get-pip)
>

Seriously, we're talking here about bundling pip with the Python installer.
Why not just bundle setuptools as well? Don't vendor it, don't jump through
hoops, just bundle it too, so that all Python environments can be assumed
to have pip and setuptools present. (Note that I'm one of the least likely
people to advocate setuptools around here, and yet even I don't see why
we're working so hard to avoid just having the thing available...)

It seems to me that by bundling pip but not setuptools, we're just making
unnecessary work for ourselves.

Paul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/attachments/20130718/65e8bf21/attachment.html>


More information about the Distutils-SIG mailing list