[Distutils] Specific packaging goals and a tentative timeline

Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Fri Jul 19 10:31:41 CEST 2013


On 19 July 2013 18:17, Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 19 July 2013 05:06, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>     * (hopefully) add support for indirect imports (see
>> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/import-sig/2013-July/000645.html for
>> the draft PEP - thanks Eric for taking this from a rough idea in email
>> to a concrete proposal!)
>
>
> Looking at the import-sig archives, it looks like the list is essentially
> dead (I obviously unsubscribed some time ago, as I hadn't received the
> referenced email).

There hasn't been a lot to talk about since the namespace package discussions :)

> Might be worth discussing this on python-dev?

Given the functionality it aims to replace, here would probably be a
better place for preliminary discussions to thrash out a detailed
proposal. Eric and I were actually wondering about whether or not to
cross-post it.

Cheers,
Nick.

--
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia


More information about the Distutils-SIG mailing list