[Distutils] Deprecate and Block requires/provides
Michael Foord
fuzzyman at gmail.com
Thu Oct 17 17:49:40 CEST 2013
On 17 October 2013 16:23, Jim Fulton <jim at zope.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Michael Foord <fuzzyman at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 17 October 2013 11:56, Donald Stufft <donald at stufft.io> wrote:
> >>
> >> Arguably it's already broken. I've had to explain to a number of people
> >> that it won't cause their dependencies to install. I think its way more
> user
> >> friendly to tell them up front then to confuse them when it doesn't
> work or
> >> when it appears to work but they get an error from a -
> >>
> >
> > You're proposing replacing "arguably broken" (by some definition)
>
> Is there any reason to think that it ever actually worked in any way?
>
>
Package upload certainly worked, and that is what is going to be broken.
Michael
> Jim
>
> --
> Jim Fulton
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/jimfulton
>
--
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/
May you do good and not evil
May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others
May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
-- the sqlite blessing http://www.sqlite.org/different.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/attachments/20131017/31902b18/attachment.html>
More information about the Distutils-SIG
mailing list