[Distutils] PEP 453 Round 2 - Explicit bootstrapping of pip in Python installations
Alex Burke
alexjeffburke at gmail.com
Sun Sep 15 21:56:35 CEST 2013
On Sunday, 15 September 2013, Donald Stufft wrote:
> So there've been a number of updates to PEP453, so i'm posting it here
> again for more discussion:
>
> Viewable online at: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0453/
>
> <snip PEP text>
Hey,
I've been trying hard to follow the discussions but please forgive this
question if its has been hashed out already.
I was a little concerned, despite it being an implementation detail, about
bundling a pip which ends up being present somewhere whwerever the
bootstrap is.
I know the concept of a mini-pip has been abandoned, but I couldn't help
thinking about the pip / setuptools as wheels in Nick's roadmap summary.
Instead of a copy of pip, could there not be minimal code to simply fetch
the wheel and install that or perhaps even use it directly (a la what was
possible with eggs)?
Perhaps that is already too much code and there are good reasons not to do
this, but hoped asking would make it clear.
Thanks, Alex J Burke.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/attachments/20130915/83a9171b/attachment.html>
More information about the Distutils-SIG
mailing list