[Distutils] Standard packaging API? (was Re: Are there any plans to move to pip/wheels in buildout?)
Vinay Sajip
vinay_sajip at yahoo.co.uk
Mon Dec 1 20:54:18 CET 2014
AFAIK pip does use distlib (it is vendored by pip), but only for some ancillary functions such as pre-release version checks.
I'm not sure it's a good idea to use pip's internal API (as it's internal, and I don't believe it's been designed for use as a library by external code).
Regards,
Vinay Sajip From: Leonardo Rochael Almeida <leorochael at gmail.com>
To: distutils sig <distutils-sig at python.org>
Sent: Monday, 1 December 2014, 16:23
Subject: Re: [Distutils] Standard packaging API? (was Re: Are there any plans to move to pip/wheels in buildout?)
I thought distlib was supposed to be that API... Even though pip doesn't use it.
Though that would mean a new major version of buildout that worked on wheels exclusively instead of eggs.
Pip itself has an internal API in the `pip.commands` package. From a casual glance it seems usable from other programs. I.e. you could import `pip.commands.install:Install`, instantiate and call `.run()`.
On 1 December 2014 at 12:53, Jim Fulton <jim at zope.com> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Piotr Dobrogost
<p at lists-2014.dobrogost.net> wrote:
> Are there any plans to move from easy_install/eggs to pip/wheels in buildout?
Buildout doesn't really use easy_install. It uses
setuptools. Originally, I tried to use easy_install directly (and do
in some special cases where I shouldn't), but I needed a real API,
which is why I moved down to setuptools. My hope is that some new API
will emerge to replace setuptools.
> I have an impression that buildout project has stagnated
I prefer to say it's stable. :)
A great sign is that other folks on the project have driven recent work.
> which is
> unfortunate taking into consideration how much python packaging has
> changed recently.
Buildout as it, is is entirely dependent on setuptools to add wheel
support, at least until a new API emerges.
AFAIK, pip doesn't provide an API for use by other tools. I'd be very
happy to find out I'm wrong.
I hope there's room for more than one command-line tool for working
with packages in the ecosystem. It would be crazy for each tool to
implement the low-level packaging machinery separately. We need a
library to replace setuptools that pip uses and that other tools can
use.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jimfulton
_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG at python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG at python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/attachments/20141201/a9ab4de3/attachment.html>
More information about the Distutils-SIG
mailing list