[Distutils] Surviving a Compromise of PyPI - PEP 458 and 480

[Donald Stufft]

> On Dec 22, 2014, at 1:15 PM, Vladimir Diaz <vladimir.v.diaz at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com <mailto:ncoghlan at gmail.com>> wrote:
> On 23 December 2014 at 01:46, Vladimir Diaz <vladimir.v.diaz at gmail.com <mailto:vladimir.v.diaz at gmail.com>> wrote:
> ::ping::
> 
> Has anyone in the community gotten a chance to review PEP 458 and/or PEP 480?  Community feedback would be appreciated.
> 
> Sorry about that Vladimir - I think the main PyPA devs have been focused on getting PEP 440 implemented, and the associated setuptools, pip and virtualenv updates out the door, and now we're into the end of year holiday period for many of us.
> 
> Considering that the previous drafts of PEP 458 generated quite a bit of feedback and questions, I was surprised by the lack of responses this time around (almost relieved :).  Receiving feedback from the main PyP developers after the holiday period is definitely not a problem.
> 

This is why I haven’t looked at it yet.

---
Donald Stufft
PGP: 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/attachments/20141223/f9aa800f/attachment-0001.html>