[Distutils] Surviving a Compromise of PyPI - PEP 458 and 480
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Fri Jan 2 17:14:51 CET 2015
On 3 January 2015 at 01:31, Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2 January 2015 at 14:25, Donald Stufft <donald at stufft.io> wrote:
> > Either way though, I suggest focus on PEP 458 (with an eye towards not
> > making any decisions which will require changes on the client side to
> > PEP 480).
> +1 on all of this.
> I agree that PEP 458 is (relatively speaking) an obvious thing to do,
> and if the people who have to do the work for it are happy, I think it
> should just go ahead.
> I'd like to see the PEPs reworded a bit to be less intimidating to the
> non-specialist. For PEPs about the trust model for PyPI, it's ironic
> that I have to place a lot of trust in the PEP authors simply because
> I don't understand half of what they are saying ;-)
FWIW, Niels Ferguson's and Bruce Scheier's "Practical Cryptography" was
probably the single most enlightening book I've read on the topic. The NIST
standards in this area are also genuinely excellent (the occasional less
than ideal technical recommendation from certain government agencies
notwithstanding), and if you can afford the paywall (or work for an
organisation that can do so), actually reading relevant sections of IEEE
802.11i was a key part of my own learning. (My specific interest was in
authentication protocols for access control, hence why I was reading the
Wi-Fi WPA2 spec, but a lot of the underlying cryptographic concepts are
shared between the different kinds of digital verification)
For broader context, Schneier's "Secrets and Lies" is good from a technical
perspective, while the more recent "Liars and Outliers" looks to situate
the security mindset in a broader social environment. There's a reason
Schneier is as well respected as he is - if you're ever looking for general
advice on how to be pragmatically paranoid, then he's a great source to
That said, while I doubt we're going to be able to completely de-jargonise
the PEP details, I agree it would be worthwhile to ensure there's a clear
explanation of the practical consequences for folks that we'd otherwise
lose in the cryptographic weeds.
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Distutils-SIG