[Distutils] Implementing large changes in small increments

Ian Cordasco graffatcolmingov at gmail.com
Fri Mar 6 23:40:43 CET 2015


On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:17 AM, anatoly techtonik <techtonik at gmail.com> wrote:
> Stealing some packaging code from Go and tweaking may not be that bad idea. =)
> At least they use code review system to let new people learn and old
> people share.

Yep and most of the people working on Go are paid to do so. Sharing
information through code review is necessary inside a corporation and
worth being fired over if you don't.

> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:51 AM, Ian Cordasco <graffatcolmingov at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Wait, I have an idea. Let's rewrite pip in Rust! ;)
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
>>> On 03/06/2015 11:06 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
>>>
>>>> That's “small changes only, otherwise your change gets rejected”, of
>>>> course.
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, otherwise submitting a patch that replaces the entire source
>>> code of Python with Ruby would be a sure-fire way to get it
>>> accepted. :-)
>>>
>>> --
>>> Greg
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG at python.org
>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
>> _______________________________________________
>> Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG at python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
>
>
>
> --
> anatoly t.


More information about the Distutils-SIG mailing list