[Distutils] Implementing large changes in small increments
Paul Moore
p.f.moore at gmail.com
Sat Mar 7 00:15:14 CET 2015
On 6 March 2015 at 23:01, Donald Stufft <donald at stufft.io> wrote:
> Tooling wise, Github PRs work well for us. I don’t (and I don’t believe that
> any of the other core devs) have any major issues with them.
>
> Github issues on the other hand, they function “OK” but it would be nice to
> have something that we can allow anyone to modify the state of tickets to
> help with triage. However even this isn’t a super pressing concern because
> our ticket count is small enough that I don’t think there’s likely to be too
> many to be handled by people commenting on issues and a core team coming in
> to change things. However if someone has a proposal for a different issue
> tracker (and plans for how to migrate to it), personally I’d be willing to
> listen.
I'm also fine with github. I don't have an issue with the issue
tracker, although as Donald says it would be helpful if it had a
concept of "tracker privileges" separate from "core committer". But
that's *not* a big enough concern to me that I'd want to go to a
different tool.
Paul
More information about the Distutils-SIG
mailing list