[Distutils] The future of invoking pip
Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
chris.barker at noaa.gov
Thu Nov 12 21:09:23 EST 2015
> If we waved our hands and were able to magically make Python package
> management perfect, what would that look like?
well, I think the command would be:
python install package_name
I know there are good reasons to keep package installer development out of
core, but if have ensurepip-- we could do this.
CHB
Would that kind of discussion even be valuable?
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015, 6:22 PM Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com> wrote:
I totally get why people dislike the ergonomics of 'python -m pip',
but we can also acknowledge that it does solve a real technical
problem: it strictly reduces the number of things that can go wrong,
in a tool that's down at the base of the stack.
_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG at python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/attachments/20151112/37fad409/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Distutils-SIG
mailing list