[Distutils] PEP 517: Build system API

Thomas Kluyver thomas at kluyver.me.uk
Thu Nov 24 17:33:54 EST 2016

I've made PRs against PEP 517 for:

Underscore to dash in build-backend:

1a: Add a user parameter to the install_editable hook


1c: Get rid of the install_editable hook

I'm leaning towards 1c; it can always be standardised in a separate PEP,
and an optional hook added back.


On Thu, Nov 24, 2016, at 09:06 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 24 November 2016 at 00:32, Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com> wrote:
> > Also note that just like we decided to split the basic pyproject.toml
> > proposal (now PEP 518) from the build system interface proposal (now
> > PEP 517), it might (probably) makes sense to split the editable
> > install part of the build system interface proposal from the rest,
> > just in the interests of making incremental progress.
> This would be my preference. I'm assuming (again, incremental
> progress) that "pip install -e" will still work as at present for
> projects that don't use the new infrastructure, so it's hardly an
> urgent need.
> Paul
> _______________________________________________
> Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig

More information about the Distutils-SIG mailing list