[Distutils] Mirroring PyPI JSON Locally
Cooper Ry Lees
me at cooperlees.com
Wed Aug 23 23:59:40 EDT 2017
Thanks all for your points.
Is it fine if I get a Informational PEP going to discuss 'Metadata Repository API'? I will structure it similar to PEP503, but also talk about:
- The data exposed today (Specification)
-- And possibly call on some PyPI people to correct me where I guess wrong
- How mirrors should mirror it
- Possible furure enhancements (JSONLD etc.)
What else should we have in this PEP?
> On Aug 23, 2017, at 7:04 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 24 August 2017 at 04:59, Donald Stufft <donald at stufft.io> wrote:
>> I don’t have a major opinion on a PEP for the JSON api or not. It depends I
>> guess on whether tools like bandersnatch/devpi/etc want to offer it. Given
>> that this is all brought on by a PR to bandersnatch it appears that there is
>> a reasonable argument that it is something that those tools want, and
>> standardizing it is a good idea.
> +1, especially as it will help clarify the required test cases for
> Warehouse as well (I'm not sure how much of the JSON API has been
> implemented at this point).
> Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
> Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG at python.org
More information about the Distutils-SIG