[Distutils] Fwd: Re: PEP 517 again

xoviat xoviat at gmail.com
Thu Aug 24 10:29:48 EDT 2017


I understand that, but what I disagree with is modifying build_wheel to
make up for a lack of consensus on editable installs.

On Aug 24, 2017 9:27 AM, "Thomas Kluyver" <thomas at kluyver.me.uk> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017, at 03:05 PM, xoviat wrote:
>
> During development, you want to use an editable install, which does modify
> the source tree.
>
>
> I think it was before you joined the discussion, but editable installs
> came up before and have deliberately been left out of PEP 517 because of
> the complexities. I am very keen that we do not go back into that
> discussion.
>
> I particularly want to hear from Nick, Daniel, Donald and Paul on their
> understanding of the build_directory parameter. There were reasons why it
> got added, and even if those reasons no longer seem so convincing to me,
> it's only going to be removed again if we can reach a consensus on working
> without it.
>
> Thomas
>
> _______________________________________________
> Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/attachments/20170824/06cdcb83/attachment.html>


More information about the Distutils-SIG mailing list