[Distutils] RFC: PEP 566 - Metadata for Python Software Packages 1.3

[Wes Turner]

>From "[distutils] Multiple package authors" [1]

- How should multiple author-email and maintainer-email addresses be
specified?

- Should we add security-email and/or security-disclosure-instructions?


[1] http://markmail.org/thread/xmwfktnsbmpakv6b

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 6 December 2017 at 02:39, Dustin Ingram <dustin.ingram at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'd appreciate your feedback on the following Metadata 1.3 PEP.
> >
> > The goal here is not to provide a full specification for all fields as
> > in previous PEPs, but to:
> >
> > * Motivate and describe the addition of the new fields or changes to
> > existing fields;
> > * Point to the Core Metadata Specifications reference document as the
> > canonical source for the specification.
>
> Hi folks,
>
> While I'd normally step up as BDFL-Delegate for an interoperability
> specification like this one, I'm actually going to be offline for most
> of the rest of the year, which I figure wouldn't be especially
> conducive to running an effective and timely review process :)
>
> So while I'll note that I'm personally happy with the PEP as it
> currently stands (based on my review of Dustin's earlier drafts), I've
> also asked Daniel Holth if he'd be willing to handle the task of final
> review and approval for this PEP as the original author of the wheel
> specification, and Daniel's graciously agreed to do so.
>
> Regards,
> Nick.
>
> --
> Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
> _______________________________________________
> Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/attachments/20171207/5b9934fe/attachment-0001.html>