[Distutils] status check on PEP 517
Brett Cannon
brett at python.org
Thu Jul 20 15:28:55 EDT 2017
On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 at 03:56 Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 3:22 AM, Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 20 July 2017 at 10:46, Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com> wrote:
> >> To make this concrete: I'm *pretty* sure (?) that at this point all
> >> the basic elements in my "simplified" rewrite are things that we now
> >> have consensus are needed in some form, so maybe we can use that as a
> >> kind of "minimal core" reference point:
> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/njsmith/peps/commits/517-refactor-streamline/pep-0517.txt
> >
> > I don't have time this week to look at this, sorry, but a couple of
> points:
> >
> > 1) This links to a commit in your repo, not to the actual document.
>
> Ugh, sorry! Pasted the wrong link. This is the correct one:
>
>
> https://github.com/njsmith/peps/blob/517-refactor-streamline/pep-0517.txt
>
> > Also, I'd *really* prefer a rendered version if I'm going to review
> > this.
>
> Annoyingly, the PEPs repo uses a .txt extension for .rst files, thus
> cleverly preventing github from doing anything useful by default...
>
We will happily accept help in converting plaintext PEPs into reST ones so
we can universally change the file extensions to .rst (see
https://github.com/python/peps/issues/1) :)
-Brett
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/attachments/20170720/56fff4ce/attachment.html>
More information about the Distutils-SIG
mailing list