[DOC-SIG] Library reference manual debate
Edward Welbourne
Edward Welbourne <eddyw@lsl.co.uk>
Mon, 17 Nov 1997 16:09:22 GMT
Guido:
>> ain't broken." I personally have access to a working LaTeX
>> installation, the latex2html converter produces adequate HTML (I still
Fred:
> It's out of date and should be updated, but does work for the Python
> documentation. I have found very reasonable LaTeX2e documents that
> can't be formatted correctly using the CNRI installation.
Yup, I used to be a TeXnician but it's so long since I've had a
non-fragile installation that I've given up on it. I endure LaTeX for
legacy reasons, but I don't write in it except where I have to.
This is genuinely a major problem with LaTeX: once a site has got a few
hacked .sty files, you can forget about the portability of LaTeX. The
entire TeX system is too brittle, for this it will die.
Pity: I still have a lot of fondness for it.
It was a programmer's documentation form.
Eddy.
_______________
DOC-SIG - SIG for the Python Documentation Project
send messages to: doc-sig@python.org
administrivia to: doc-sig-request@python.org
_______________