[Doc-SIG] Documentation tool
John Mitchell
John Mitchell <johnm@magnet.com>
Mon, 22 Jun 1998 12:09:20 -0400 (EDT)
On Sat, 20 Jun 1998, Mark Hammond wrote:
> >> I dont know what [JavaDoc formatting is like]. Is it possible to
> >> summarize?
> >
> >Yep. You start a comment with "/**" (instead of "/*", and add in a
> few
> >magic tags. As in:
>
> This is almost identical to "autodoc", the tool I wrote about before
> to the SWIG List (Ive suggested that SWIG generate this sort of
> documentation directly in the sources).
woo-woo! After getting nary a hit w/ Python.org's search engine, I found
"doc.py version 0.8" at http://starship.skyport.net/~lemburg/Software.html
Is this what you're talking about?
Doesnt seem to handle any javadoc-isms, like @see...
So, where's "autodoc" at?
> When I suggested something like this a while ago to the DOC SIG, the
> consensus was that it does not scan well enough for humans. People
> thought that the doc strings should be less intrusive than that.
I dont agree. I want low-hassle input that makes for pretty output, with
cross-language support. "@see" isnt bad, but magic parsing (a la Jim
Fulton) doesnt do it for me.
- j