[Doc-SIG] SGML Python docs
Fred L. Drake
Fred L. Drake, Jr." <fdrake@acm.org
Tue, 8 Sep 1998 17:10:12 -0400 (EDT)
John Skaller writes:
> Well, it is possible I think with the new Latex format,
> which is clean and comparatively well formalised, to produce
Thanks! There are still a few rough edges, but things are
improving, especially if you look at the latest stuff in the CVS
archive.
> You will first have to get Guido and others to give up their
> pet formats -- be it Latex or Frame maker.
FrameMaker is no longer used, so we only have to worry about one
legacy format, LaTeX.
I don't think this is a "pet format" issue; there are advantages to
SGML/XML conversion, once there's a specific DTD and the SGML v. XML
decision is made (it's not at all clear which to use). There are also
advantages to *not* performing a conversion, primarily that the time
saved can be used to actually improve the content of the
documentation.
-Fred
--
Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake@acm.org>
Corporation for National Research Initiatives
1895 Preston White Dr. Reston, VA 20191