[Doc-SIG] docstring grammar

David Ascher da@ski.org
Mon, 29 Nov 1999 15:28:28 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time)

On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, Edward Welbourne wrote:

> As I remember, gendoc used *emphasis* and **strong**, which does
> adequately (and may be in use by some of us), though I can see a case
> against the doubling.

Fine with me.

> to be honest, equating it to PRE I don't like; Code deserves to be a
> keyword which switches the context-sensitive parsing to expecting python
> code...

All good points, and fine with me.