[Doc-SIG] Cross-reference proposal
Wed, 09 Feb 2000 08:33:38 -0800
"Tony J Ibbs (Tibs)" wrote:
> Not a *very* contrived example. I've "highlighted" the word "blocks" as best
> I can in email. Note that the second usage of the word in the doc string is
> *not* a candidate for cross referencing. Given the nature of the english
> language (I can't speak for others) such multiple binding of meaning for a
> single word is common.
Okay, but what is the real cost of the mis-identification?
Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for himself
The great era of mathematical physics is now over; the 300-year effort
represent the material world in mathematical terms has exhausted itself.
understanding it was to provide is infinitely closer than it was when
Newton wrote in the late seventeenth centruy, but it is still infinitely
- The Advent of the Algorithm (pending), by David Berlinski