[Doc-SIG] Docstrings Format
Moshe Zadka <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Tue, 7 Nov 2000 10:26:31 +0200 (IST)
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Tim Peters wrote:
> That's two people who already suggested ST-NG, so I'll have to take
> a look at it.
> I don't know anything about ST-NG. I do know that my current employer likes
> it a lot, and they can buy my vote without even asking for it <wink>.
Is a vote for ST-NG a vote for Bush too? <duck!>
> Seriously, ST has been in production use at DC for years, so I'm with the
> seeming consensus that it wins by default.
OK, as soon as my home computer finishes upgrading dpkg and I can connect
to it for more then 1 Byte/sec, I'll add references to ST-NG in the PEP.
Note that this means that we have to address Mark H's comments:
-- extending ST-NG for Python's use (see goals "a" and "b" in the PEP)
-- enforcing meta-ST-NG rules, so the collection of all docstrings will
form a valid ST-NG document (or perhaps not. Is this the next
documentation's-fun!-ly y'rs, Z.
Moshe Zadka <email@example.com> -- 95855124