[Doc-SIG] PEP 216

Edward D. Loper edloper@gradient.cis.upenn.edu
Tue, 13 Mar 2001 11:55:43 EST

Just out of curiosity, how is this new proposed PEP going to relate
to PEP 216 ("docstring format")?  Will it replace it?  If not, then
maybe we should just work on extending PEP 216?  If you're interested
in this PEP stuff, and haven't read PEP 216, you should probably go
read it..:


Does anyone know if Moshe Zadka still actively working on this?