[Doc-SIG] suggestions for a PEP
Tony J Ibbs (Tibs)
Fri, 16 Mar 2001 11:04:35 -0000
Me, pulling things out at random...
Edward Loper wrote:
> I would interpret that as:
> <PARA> ... </PARA>
Post-alpha docutils, we are definitely going to have to have a
discussion about what we want to use as terms in the DTD - which is
good, since I'm not convinced that the tags I've come up with are the
best possible choice.
> But we have to be careful here, since the analogy doesn't completely
> carry over. Notably, this isn't what most Python programmers would
> think it is::
> The 3rd person is not part of the author list; it's some sort of
> subparagraph of it, which doesn't make much sense to me..
Oh yes they are (chorus of "behind you" (obPanto reference)).
Well, actually, it's more complex than that.
The example is *either* similar to::
Author: Person1 Person2
(but in which case it also isn't a labelled paragraph, because "Person1"
didn't start a new sub-paragraph, and non-subparagraphs labelled
paragraphs can't have more than one line, if you see what I mean), *or*
it is similar to::
in which case Person3 *is* an author.
It will always be necessary to do::
to get a legacy-style ST heading, it would be too confusing otherwise.
Tony J Ibbs (Tibs) http://www.tibsnjoan.co.uk/
"Bounce with the bunny. Strut with the duck.
Spin with the chickens now - CLUCK CLUCK CLUCK!"
BARNYARD DANCE! by Sandra Boynton
My views! Mine! Mine! (Unless Laser-Scan ask nicely to borrow them.)