On ordered Lists (was RE: [Doc-SIG] Formalizing ST)
Thu, 29 Mar 2001 20:26:32 +0200 (MEST)
Guido van Rossum:
[...about writing ordered lists in plain text style...]
> Or my preference:
> Some text.
> 1. This is a list item
> continued here.
> 2. This is the second item.
What do people (and Guido?) think of the following style for ordered
lists? I've seen this used in EMail and News quite often:
(1) This is a ordered list item
(2) This is the second item.
(3) Items may consist of several
As long as the paragraphs keep
This is text following the list.
Of course this would require, that indentation plays an important role
in an upcoming text structure grammar. The parser should always fall
back into literal (aka preformatted) paragraph mode on any material,
which violates the rather strict grammar rules.
Only text paragraphs which are properly (equally) indented plain text
and contain no hyphens at the end of lines, should be allowed for
reformatting in propotional fonts and with new line breaks.
I disagree in this respect with Tony and may be others in this SIG.
Allowing free form paragraphs like this one here for reformatting
is simply to dangerous. Mandating the rule, that normal text paragraphs
must be aligned on the left side seems to be a very reasonable
restriction to me. Otherwise they should come out in fixed font
and people will see what they are used to before the advent of clever
Text structure recognition tools.
The IMO disclaimer applies here as well. It was not my intention "to
throw oars into Tonys and Edwards work.
Best regards, Peter
Peter Funk, Oldenburger Str.86, D-27777 Ganderkesee, Germany, Fax:+49 4222950260
office: +49 421 20419-0 (ArtCom GmbH, Grazer Str.8, D-28359 Bremen, Germany)