[Doc-SIG] [Python-Dev] status of development documentation
Fred L. Drake, Jr.
fdrake at acm.org
Thu Dec 22 15:35:40 CET 2005
On Thursday 22 December 2005 05:19, Michael Foord wrote:
> Hmmm... I submitted some plain text (might have been reST actually) docs
> as a suggested addition to urllib2. The response from the maintainer)
> was that I ought to submit it as patches against the original Tex
> document.
Did you submit this as a documentation issue on the SF tracker? If this is
still outstanding, please point me to the submission.
> *However* - there was no implication that the maintainer was happy to
> work with plain text submissions.
This sounds like a specific individual isn't interested in converting to
LaTeX, which isn't surprising (though unfortunate). We'll have to find a
better way to handle this, since I don't want to be turning away plain text
contributions due to format.
I hope it wasn't me, in a moment of madness. :-/
-Fred
--
Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org>
More information about the Doc-SIG
mailing list