[docs] math and Cmath lib interferences

Ricky John richardterrelive at live.ca
Tue Aug 9 16:03:46 CEST 2011





to whom it may concern  here are a few suggestions to make life easier with python at least i hope  
http://docs.python.org/bugs.html
 
mailto:docs at python.org 
 
 I'm not a programmer but i like to use Python with Blender and like to work with Complex numbersbut right now i think there is room for improvement for the Cmath lib or add a new lib may be.
 so here are a few suggestions:
 
1- Interference between math and Cmath lib
 
 
 
 
# http://docs.python.org/library/math.html#module-math
# http://docs.python.org/library/cmath.html#module-cmat
 
 
 if these 2 modules are loaded and you try to find a log10  for a real number you get by default the Cmath.log10(x) with a Complex Result!
 
 i think it would be more logical to default to math.log10(x)  for X being a real number which is not the case right now!
 
 Suggestion:
 
 change the name for Cmath log10  for something like Clog10(x) to get a Complex number for X and the result!
 then by default log10 for X real would be a real number and not a complex one!
 
 Other functions which could be change too:
 
 cmath.sqrt(x)¶     ---> cmath.csqrt(x)¶
 cmath.log(x[, base])  ---> ¶cmath.Clog(x[, base])¶
 cmath.exp(x)¶    ---> cmath.cexp(x)¶
 cmath.acos(x)¶    ----> cmath.cacos(x)¶
 cmath.asin(x)¶    ----> cmath.casin(x)¶
 cmath.atan(x)¶    ----> cmath.catan(x)¶
 cmath.cos(x     ----> cmath.ccos(x
 cmath.sin(x)    ----> cmath.csin(x)
 cmath.tan(x)¶    ----> cmath.ctan(x)¶
 
 
 cmath.acosh(x)¶    ----> cmath.cacosh(x)¶
 cmath.asinh(x)¶    ----> cmath.casinh(x)¶
 cmath.atanh(x)    ----> cmath.atanh(x)
 cmath.atanh(x)¶    ----> cmath.catanh(x)¶
 
 cmath.cosh(x)¶    ----> cmath.ccosh(x)¶
 cmath.sinh(x)    ----> cmath.csinh(x)
 
 cmath.tanh(x)¶    ----> cmath.ctanh(x)¶
 
 
 
 Unless the Argument is complex then it would use the Complex function but for real number it should default to the math lib functions.
 
 
 
 
2 - C math  Polar  operators
 
 Right now it appears that polar operators don't exist 
 
 Suggestion add new polar Operators  + - X / using polar values
 
 Ex:  Z1=120 /__ 0 Radian angle
   z2= 10/__1  Radian angle
 
 New operator Polar +  :   Z1+ Z2  = 120 /__ 0 +  10/__1 
     Polar -  :   Z1/ Z2  = 120 /__ 0 -  10/__1 
     Polar X  :   Z1/ Z2  = 120 /__ 0 X  10/__1 
     Polar /  :   Z1/ Z2  = 120 /__ 0 /  10/__1 
 
 
 Note: In electrical engeenering we very often use polar notation for Voltage current and Z  impedance values
       because it is easier to visualize it  with angle then using the  rectangular form.
       
       I think this would make Cmath more user friendly in any case!    if possible make the angle  like  120D  or  1.5R  for having the flexibiliy  to give angle in degrees or radians!
       
       3-  complex matrix       it might also be very usefull to have the basic capabilities to work with and solve complex matrix      like we do in electrical engeneering calculations       hope this can be inmplemented too may be inside the Cmath lib!
 i hope  these suggestions make sense   and  also hoping these  can be implemented  to make life easier with python thanks & have a nice day  Richard Jean       		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/attachments/20110809/76d4906e/attachment.html>


More information about the docs mailing list