[docs] [issue13237] subprocess docs should emphasise convenience functions
Nick Coghlan
report at bugs.python.org
Wed Oct 26 22:48:49 CEST 2011
Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> added the comment:
That's deliberate, as I'm only showing a selected subset of the full
signature at that point and using the subprocess API's with positional
arguments would lead to almost incomprehensible code. I'm not in any great
hurry to forward port though, so I'm happy to wait until you get a chance to
review the changes.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13237>
_______________________________________
More information about the docs
mailing list